Printable Affidavit form Template

Wednesday, February 20th 2019. | Sample Templates



Printable Affidavit form Template- 48 sample affidavit forms & templates affidavit of support guarantor form template – besthomedesigns free affidavit of ownership form free texas affidavit of heirship 53 111 a form residence proof format payment proof 2020 free 6 legal affidavit forms in ms word sample address affidavit form new sample x affidavit equitable interest form free printable affidavit of one and the same person template – gahara sample letter affidavit for form i 751
sample affidavit forms templates of support guarantor form template for employment
guarantor form template – besthomedesigns, source:besthomedesigns.co
e18da3620b6f1fafbbb32
FREE AFFIDAVIT OF OWnership FORM, source:pinterest.com
texas affidavit of heirship form 53 111 a
Free Texas Affidavit of Heirship 53 111 a Form, source:affidavitforms.org

Sample Example & Format Templates Free Excel, Doc, PDF, xls affidavit of heirship free printable form printable affidavit forms free printable affidavit of correction for title blank affidavit form pdf elegant 20 convenient lost receipt 48 sample affidavit forms & templates affidavit of support free general affidavit form pdf 6 sworn statement form free template hq counter affidavit format tagalog christmas 40 free notary acknowledgement & statement templates free affidavit of memorandum for purchase and sale form affidavit employment form elegant 30 basic free affidavit 21 affidavit form sample formats sample affidavit georgia free 18 witness statement forms in pdf

send textual content to word In my app, I even have a text box that takes the text and transfers it to w observe doc for printing. It does this with the bookmark feature in be aware. On the word doc, I best have "X" volume of house. The bookmark in be aware will auto size and fill with as much textual content as I desire, but I deserve to restrict this, and handiest have (as an instance) up to 900 characters in that certain bookmark. The remainder of the text I should go to a seperate sheet. right here is the (stripped down) code i use to transfer the textual content to the be aware doc as an illistration: Public Sub printPC_Affidavit() Dim oWord As word.utility Dim oDoc As word.doc oWord = CreateObject("word.utility") oWord.seen = real oDoc = oWord.files.Add(x.myPC_AffidavitDOTFile) oDoc.Bookmarks.item("txtOffense1").latitude.textual content = frmPC_Affidavit.txtOffense1.text oDoc.Bookmarks.merchandise("txtOffense2").latitude.text = frmPC_Affidavit.txtOffense2.text oDoc.Bookmarks.item("txtPC").latitude.textual content = frmPC_Affidavit.txtPC.textual content oWord.PrintPreview = genuine ‘ print preview mode oWord = Nothing oDoc = Nothing GC.assemble() end Sub So the bookmark in observe is called txtPC. i could need to create a different template in notice, and in it create one more bookmark (that i may call) txtPC2 or whatever. So how do I get any characters over the 900 over to the 2d template? WHISTLEBLOWER AFFIDAVIT: Programmer built Vote Rigging Prototype at Republican Congressman’s Request!
READER feedback ON"WHISTLEBLOWER AFFIDAVIT: Programmer constructed Vote Rigging Prototype at Republican Congressman’s Request!"(91 Responses up to now…) remark #1 [Permalink] …

gassed
spoke of on 12/6/2004 @ 11:20 am PT…

quality work. Lets all pray that these items goes mach 5. remark #2 [Permalink] …

BobbyinPortland

spoke of on 12/6/2004 @ eleven:31 am PT…

that is superb!!! i am hoping that this is the smoking gun that we need to show how low these individuals will go. comment #three [Permalink] …

Psyop Samurai
observed on 12/6/2004 @ eleven:forty five am PT…

You rule, Brad!!! hold it comin’! :hehe: remark #4 [Permalink] …

Mixter

observed on 12/6/2004 @ eleven:46 am PT…

outstanding! Now if this man does not disappear, might be this should be the starting of the conclusion of the Dubya stolen elections! comment #5 [Permalink] …

bejammin075
spoke of on 12/6/2004 @ 12:56 pm PT…

remark #6 [Permalink] …

Beth Craig
spoke of on 12/6/2004 @ 1:28 pm PT…

🙂 Wow! If this holds up, it’s going to make Watergate look like petty theft! remark #7 [Permalink] …

Michele
stated on 12/6/2004 @ 1:32 pm PT…

When do you suppose the leading movement media will choose this up? Is it even price the time to tune into them any more? remark #eight [Permalink] …

Steve

referred to on 12/6/2004 @ 2:37 pm PT…

Holy Moly! I had heard about a particular contact-display operation of a utility software and this sounds strikingly regular in that an operator code is constructed into definite areas that control the characteristic via touching these distinctive areas on the monitor. sustain the amazing work, Brad! i am hoping that this man, Mr. Curtis, stays protected and the story exhibits what many of us have long suspected regarding our election procedure in the united states. comment #9 [Permalink] …

Paul Landis

noted on 12/6/2004 @ 3:04 pm PT…

respectable work Brad: The reason I knew Bush would win: 30% of voters for Election Thieft 2004 have been to be completed on digital vote casting machines – Bush Vote capturing Machines. Paul J.Landis, author, "cease Bush Now" :angry: remark #10 [Permalink] …

Windy
said on 12/6/2004 @ three:14 pm PT…

i’m wondering just how the media will deal with this, notwithstanding it is correct, which I believe deep within my soul to be proper.i am elated that here’s popping out, and afraid as neatly, to be sincere. I consider that the Bush administration and people that wholeheartedly support it is going to cease at nothing to retain their existing energy. Who knows where this may lead?I hate them. remark #eleven [Permalink] …

Katherine A. Farr
noted on 12/6/2004 @ 3:43 pm PT…

someone get this man into protecting custody!!! comment #12 [Permalink] …

Ron von Arb

observed on 12/6/2004 @ three:47 pm PT…

hi There,sustain the remarkable WORK, it can be difficult work tonail the CROOKED BASTARDS. We can not get overit, we deserve to stop the CROOKS NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! comment #13 [Permalink] …

irritated lady

observed on 12/6/2004 @ 3:54 pm PT…

Thanks for the ballsy investigative journalism!at the least some people still recognize how to song a story, in contrast to the lapdog mainstream media, which has turn into a bloody disgrace. Go, Brad, go! remark #14 [Permalink] …

angry lady

referred to on 12/6/2004 @ 3:54 pm PT…

Thanks for the ballsy investigative journalism!at the least some individuals nonetheless recognize how to track a story, in contrast to the lapdog mainstream media, which has become a bloody shame. Go, Brad, go! remark #15 [Permalink] …

Chris
talked about on 12/6/2004 @ 4:04 pm PT…

If this does go down as actuality, lets use Ukraine as a template. They appear to understand what vigour to the individuals is all about. remark #sixteen [Permalink] …

Mustif
spoke of on 12/6/2004 @ 4:14 pm PT…

remark #17 [Permalink] …

Ohio Vote Fraud

said on 12/6/2004 @ four:sixteen pm PT…

comment #18 [Permalink] …

falcon
stated on 12/6/2004 @ 4:54 pm PT…

"…you’ll be aware of them by their fruit…" here is respectable information…however dwell concentrated…do not let Karl Rove spin this like he did the bush armed forces provider records on the sacrifice of Dan quite’s career…these fascist assholes would love to carry down the information superhighway…do not let this be the straw that broke the camel’s lower back… Canada is suing bush on battle crimes in Vancouver and we will legally damage these evoting machines…or not it’s the machines, stupid! yes, the Ukraine=the us, but with Media insurance…then again, we’re the new 49ers…the 49% that did not vote for this piece of **** and the whole world knows us now! help blackboxvoting.org. and by way of con Dios, mi amigos! comment #19 [Permalink] …

toosie turner
said on 12/6/2004 @ 5:03 pm PT…

Its time we take this rely to the streets and combat for democracy. We ought to use Ukraine as our instance. comment #20 [Permalink] …

rick
referred to on 12/6/2004 @ 5:07 pm PT…

obtained my hopes up however do see one factor that wants explaining pronto. The signature web page is terribly certainly in a distinct font. Why? comment #21 [Permalink] …

Dan
pointed out on 12/6/2004 @ 5:13 pm PT…

Brad, sustain the respectable work! it be individuals like you and Clint that make me proud to be an American! Let’s hope this is rarely like the Dan rather false memos. You were stating when parts of the story are as of yet unsubstantiated. I basically trust there are americans who purposely throw out fake experiences, so the true ones are viewed with too much skepticism (paranoid? probably!). right here’s the massive aspect i will in no way have in mind: HOW had been COMPUTERIZED voting MACHINES with no PAPER TRAILS EVER ALLOWED TO BE installed??? i will certainly not ever ever believe that in this high-quality old USofA, that somebody like even Ralph Nader has allowed this to happen. The handiest means votes could be stolen and manipulated is if there became common setting up of computerized voting machines without a paper trail. Are there no suggestions that avoid installing of balloting machines you can not recount during this nation??? it truly is so hard for me to get over, sorry………… comment #22 [Permalink] …

joey
stated on 12/6/2004 @ 5:38 pm PT…

notice that the web site http://www.justaflyonthewall.com is posting an incomplete zip file at the present. It is barely a small VB software (demo), this may not work unless the file votefraudcode.frm is introduced to it. comment #23 [Permalink] …

patricia jarvis
spoke of on 12/6/2004 @ 6:18 pm PT…

something bought the finally end up Buzzflashes returned, rapidly they hang this Karl Rove ,yellow alert, on their headline. Is it this font enterprise that made them a tinge paranoid, or do they be aware of some thing not yet apparent to the leisure of us? My first inclination, on analyzing the weblog, became to alert my republican son, that his hero boy might be happening in flames,now blissful I hesitated. Hate consuming crow. Going over everything, can’t in reality see the place Jerko Rove might do any damage. Anyway, incredible reporting , Brad. remark #24 [Permalink] …

kevin
mentioned on 12/6/2004 @ 6:23 pm PT…

rick: the signature page is an identical font. or not it’s the handiest web page scanned in colour and in its entirety; the rest have been interestingly scanned black-and-white (not even grayscale) and overlooked the (possibly empty) margins, therefore the variations in appearance and dimension of the text. remark #25 [Permalink] …

oc

observed on 12/6/2004 @ 6:50 pm PT…

there’s now a mirror containing PDF and GIF and be aware document (printable) versions of the affidavit, for these of you who need these formats. just go to www.civictools.org (here’s a look at various weblog created by using a innovative nonprofit). comment #26 [Permalink] …

Jen
spoke of on 12/6/2004 @ 7:01 pm PT…

Hope this crap get out on the media….get that son of a bush impeached….. comment #27 [Permalink] …

Val Zudell
observed on 12/6/2004 @ 7:12 pm PT…

God, Please give protection to Mr. Curtis from wrath and retaliation! remark #28 [Permalink] …

Alison
observed on 12/6/2004 @ 7:18 pm PT…

remark #29 [Permalink] …

Veronica E. Sissons
said on 12/6/2004 @ 7:40 pm PT…

all of us know that fraud was perpetrated within the election. Now whatever has emerged that may also certainly be substantiated. What now – do we pressure a mass complaint throughout the nation? should show up first notwithstanding. We should delay the inauguration at least except we know the truth. retain Curtis safe. Veronica remark #30 [Permalink] …

Julie
spoke of on 12/6/2004 @ eight:10 pm PT…

comment #31 [Permalink] …

wealthy
talked about on 12/6/2004 @ 8:30 pm PT…

here’s some very first rate information for those of us that are looking to see Dubya and his cronies out of vigour, however I dont feel we now have enough backing to show the election. There simply looks to be too many assholes during this nation who’re blind to what’s happening with the present administration. Let’s hope i am wrong and issues turn out in our choose, and keep up the first rate work! :angry: remark #32 [Permalink] …

red-Blooded American
referred to on 12/6/2004 @ 8:31 pm PT…

Get a clue, individuals. There turned into no fraud, no vote rigging.This so-called "afidavit" reads greater like the beginning of an affordable secret agent novel. do not you all believe or not it’s extraordinary how not one of the predominant information networks picked up on this "hot" story? As much as you all wish it become otherwise, the reality is that most of people in this country voted for Bush. Being whiny and liberal pansies have to come what may make you all think improved, as a result of there is lots of that happening out here. remark #33 [Permalink] …

Bob
referred to on 12/6/2004 @ eight:33 pm PT…

is never it ironic that the bushies say the election in Ukraine became crooked because the exit polls differed from the count number, but in the united states, when the best area they don’t match is in precincts with e-voting and no paper path and that is the reason not crooked. Let’s hope that this finally makes the bush fans at last open their eyes and admit the reality. they may be a bunch of immoral thieves and have no company having any vigour in any respect, let alone the most excellent power they presently have. The handiest hope is for frequent dissemination of the facts, and let’s pray that these are the real records! comment #34 [Permalink] …

Neil Katcher
mentioned on 12/6/2004 @ 9:32 pm PT…

unique piece. once I first read it, i received very excited, however now that i’ve had time to study the entire filing and think it over, I have a number of questions and concerns that i believe need answering. 1) is this provable beyond a shadow of a doubt? Is there tangible facts like a replica of the substances Mr. Curtis passed over to Feeney and Yang? in that case, can the precise software be uploaded right into a vote casting laptop that hasn’t been tampered with to peer if it would mimic a desktop that acted suspiciously in this previous election? however true, Curtis’ allegations most effective prove a want to fix the election and never in fact fixing it. 2) Is there any tangible proof linking Feeney to a larger plot? it’s one element to have utility, or not it’s yet another component to in reality do whatever with it in a meaningful means. until one might one way or the other set up the software while not having to be there, the volume of individuals that would should be involved makes this a difficult capsule to swallow. three) whereas i might love to consider Mr. Curtis, he does have a reason here to screw his former business. Plus, as all of us comprehend, a smoking gun doesn’t a whistleblower make. subsequently, we need the cloth in the back of it, (consider THE INSIDER… there have been studies and findings that had been purposely lined up, we might need the identical here) four) here’s in regards to the Florida Vote… there isn’t any warmth on the florida vote at present aside from Bev Harris, who some of you may additionally or may now not be aware of has been marginalizing herself by way of fighting with the very people trying to help her, supply her press. unless whatever thing enormously adjustments, a bombshell like this wants some thing extra tangible to explode. In other words, one of the vital down facets of breaking this story before it’s absolutely developed is that it offers those that may be probably masking up a scandal a chance to break any incrimminating proof and get their ducks in a row if they haven’t already. in the end, Brad sustain the complicated work, it’s tons apreciated… and you probably have any answers to these questions, please move them alongside. Thanks. remark #35 [Permalink] …

Neil Katcher
pointed out on 12/6/2004 @ 9:33 pm PT…

unique piece. once I first examine it, i received very excited, however now that i’ve had time to read the total filing and feel it over, I even have just a few questions and issues that i feel want answering. 1) is that this provable beyond a shadow of a doubt? Is there tangible evidence like a replica of the substances Mr. Curtis passed over to Feeney and Yang? if so, can the exact application be uploaded right into a balloting desktop that hasn’t been tampered with to peer if it could mimic a machine that acted suspiciously during this past election? besides the fact that true, Curtis’ allegations most effective prove a need to repair the election and not in reality fixing it. 2) Is there any tangible proof linking Feeney to a larger plot? it’s one factor to have software, or not it’s yet another aspect to truly do whatever thing with it in a significant way. except one may somehow install the software without needing to be there, the amount of folks that could deserve to be worried makes this a difficult tablet to swallow. 3) whereas i’d like to consider Mr. Curtis, he does have a rationale here to screw his former company. Plus, as all of us understand, a smoking gun doesn’t a whistleblower make. finally, we want the cloth behind it, (feel THE INSIDER… there were reviews and findings that had been purposely coated up, we might need the identical right here) 4) here’s about the Florida Vote… there isn’t any heat on the florida vote currently apart from Bev Harris, who some of you might also or can also not comprehend has been marginalizing herself by fighting with the very americans attempting to help her, give her press. unless some thing enormously adjustments, a bombshell like this needs something extra tangible to blow up. In other phrases, one of the down aspects of breaking this story earlier than it be absolutely developed is that it gives those that may well be probably overlaying up a scandal a chance to destroy any incrimminating proof and get their geese in a row if they have not already. within the conclusion, Brad sustain the challenging work, it be lots apreciated… and when you’ve got any solutions to these questions, please move them alongside. Thanks. remark #36 [Permalink] …

Elyce Ellies

referred to on 12/6/2004 @ 9:42 pm PT…

might be all of us can do some thing earlier than the inauguration. Let’s hope so. could be quality comment #37 [Permalink] …

STOP_George

pointed out on 12/6/2004 @ 10:10 pm PT…

Thanks, Brad!!! you have confirmed that bloggers are, once once more, making the mainstream media appear to be amateurs. i’ll really tune this story on my blog!!! it’s, if it ever receives mentioned in the mainstream. http://newsclipautopsy.blogspot.com/ >>> focus: VOTERGATE This web site is committed to dissect mainstream news and to expose the half-truths, mis-truths and, most significantly, the fact unnoticed. comment #38 [Permalink] …

Travieso
stated on 12/6/2004 @ 10:13 pm PT…

I in reality hope there’s meat to this. whatever thing happens, we should get Curtis some witness insurance policy. Then, we deserve to investigate fully. We should still explain it to the media in the most fundamental and concise method viable, since it receives murky when there so a lot element. We started to lose individuals. remark #39 [Permalink] …

bill Metcalfe

noted on 12/6/2004 @ 10:22 pm PT…

there’s probably no connection between the death of Mr. Lemme in Georgia and the acknowledgement by using a programmer that he inserted changes into a number of voting machines. I can also’t take into account if it turned into throughout the Presidental Election of 2000 or from a native election in Georgia. I overlook when or where I noticed the counsel. maybe BlackBox.com remark #40 [Permalink] …

Buzz
spoke of on 12/6/2004 @ 10:29 pm PT…

i wouldn’t get to worked up. the press could care less and much more so for the reason that they didn’t find it themselves. and do not predict any assist from the democrats. they are too frightened right now to do anything else that might smack of "CONSPIRACY idea!!!!". So I haven’t any doubts it is right. not one, but the press which is soundly asleep love it has been for the final 4 a long time aint’ gonna do shiite. but we are able to dream can not we? comment #forty one [Permalink] …

Travieso
stated on 12/6/2004 @ 10:forty eight pm PT…

Buzz, I consider it is just how we play our cards correct. this is why, I believe, we really need to investigate it entirely. go away nothing unturned which may go away holes in the story. If we come out with allot fo rage and anger, in the beginning, it is going to look as just general partisan ranting. however, if we hold our cool, and really live on excellent of the story and investigation, this might truly pan out. What do you believe? remark #42 [Permalink] …

Don Whiting
observed on 12/6/2004 @ 10:48 pm PT…

I do not feel any one truely receives IT. This country’s leaders are corrupt from suitable to backside and in between. There is not any salvation in a totally rigged gadget of government backed via billions of soiled bucks and lots of cut throat dirty americans. All i will say is good good fortune. changing this equipment is however a fable! comment #43 [Permalink] …

eva

mentioned on 12/7/2004 @ 1:forty three am PT…

here is remarkable reporting and interesting due to the fact i’ve been wondering when programmers will come forward and blow the whistle on these vote fraud purpetrators. We also need a reward program to get others to come back forward especially the Diebold employees as a result of they coded the optical scanners and the important vote tabulation computers. all the code should be open for public inspection. there’s a bill in congress to make the vote casting manner clear. H.R.2239: Voter self assurance and accelerated Accessibility Act of 2003. It requires a paper path and that the code for ALL e-balloting machines be made purchasable for public scrutiny. It changed into meant that this bill circulate in time for this Novembers election wager no longer with these crooks in energy. information on my weblog, plus other vote fraud connected links. remark #44 [Permalink] …

rambler
said on 12/7/2004 @ 2:48 am PT…

If here’s proper, if in the future soon we see bush and his cohorts in orange reformatory jumpsuits, i’ll delivery believing in God. In anticipation of my conversion i’m praying it happens. remark #45 [Permalink] …

Arlene Montemarano
stated on 12/7/2004 @ three:46 am PT…

comment #forty six [Permalink] …

Daniel
talked about on 12/7/2004 @ 5:26 am PT…

Martin, About your point (5): Curtis mentions that it could be effortless to make the rigging automated as a substitute of prompted with the aid of the hidden buttons. if that’s the case there would be no deserve to have manpower at each polling station. bear in mind, this is about a prototype, now not directly in regards to the utility used for the elections. If the story is validated, what it indicates is that a Republican professional become investigating the chance of stealing elections. It might also provide trails that would lead to the large deal. remark #47 [Permalink] …

Daniel
spoke of on 12/7/2004 @ 5:50 am PT…

And about why waiting so long to demonstrate this, that question is tackled by this interview. comment #forty eight [Permalink] …

Lynne
pointed out on 12/7/2004 @ 6:sixteen am PT…

We recognize the vote become hacked in more ways than may also be counted, and this can also very well be credible facts, but i am that there is not any reference concerning a)who took the affadavit, b)changed into it brought on via a criminal investigation; and in that case, c) who’s investigating? comment #forty nine [Permalink] …

seamonkey
pointed out on 12/7/2004 @ 7:47 am PT…

listen Brad, there isn’t any clarification of the discrepancy in the typeface between the first three pages and the signature web page. this definitely looks like disinformation. if it finally ends up to be one more Karl Rove trick to kill the investigation into precise FRAUD that took region on the polls, and also you ARE THE ONE who propagated it, I in my opinion am going to grasp you by means of the balls off of Golden Gate bridge. both returned this up with information or RETRACT! remark #50 [Permalink] …

gassed
pointed out on 12/7/2004 @ eight:39 am PT…

Oh sure…if this is dis-information it will ruim our integrity. in spite of everything…study how the Vince Foster garbage ruined the correct wing extremists. And an additional issue…haven’t these Bushies realized that after they birth throwing around the "whiny pansies" labels that they are just projecting their self loathing on to us. it is relatively clear that the majority of them do not work in intellectual fitness environments. remark #51 [Permalink] …

Paul
mentioned on 12/7/2004 @ 11:23 am PT…

Wow! You guys on the kook fringe are just crammed will all kinds of conspiracies. I consider gassed, I do not believe that Vince Foster last talked to Clint Curtis but most likely Curtis is the one who shot Ron Brown within the head. comment #fifty two [Permalink] …

Terri
talked about on 12/7/2004 @ 11:57 am PT…

🙂 I do hope this receives to the mainstream media. Is Olbermann on the story? He looks to be the only media man covering the election fraud of 2004 remark #fifty three [Permalink] …

Bryan
noted on 12/7/2004 @ 12:19 pm PT…

Seamonkey, or not it’s fairly glaring the last page became scanned, so that the signature can be there. I doubt anyone can be inclined to put his/her credibility on the road for something if it turned into definitely a pretend. in case you’ve noticed this web page at in all places the past months, you will be aware of Brad has been thorough and deliberate in his assessments. That observed, i am now not purchasing this story yet. in any respect. i am totally teased, yet wholly unconvinced. i’m completely happy the Judiciary Committee is calling into this may still it prove that any of this is substantiated. Neil and Martin’s questions above, in particular N#three and M#5, ring authentic. remark #fifty four [Permalink] …

Martin
spoke of on 12/7/2004 @ 12:45 pm PT…

i might be quite willing to accept as true with that voter fraud can also have taken place in 2004. however, i’m reluctant to trust this particular story is true. There are several questions which i want answered: (1) Why wait four years to make this revelation? (2) For whom was this notarized affadavit organized? To what conclusion? (three) In 2000, was digital voting utilized in any counties in Florida? The quote from Mrs. Yang implies forthcoming usage of the software in Southern Florida. i was below the influence that touchscreen balloting became only a really contemporary building in that state. (four) become the prototype developed to work with any specific classification of electronic balloting computer? Or, changed into it only a accepted proof of idea? (5) The idea of a touchscreen application seems extremely faulty to me. Touchscreens exist simplest on the individual voting machines at each and every polling stations. this could be an exceedingly inefficient way to hack the vote. it would require manpower at every precinct and demanding possibility of discovery. Hacking can be lots more safely and efficaciously achieved on the desktop compiling the effects at the county stage. what is the proposed state of affairs of how the touchscreen software could be used? comment #fifty five [Permalink] …

Seth
talked about on 12/7/2004 @ 1:01 pm PT…

This story bound is bringing lots of consideration – I can not get to bradblog.com in any respect as a result of high traffic it looks, I ought to use the bradfriedman.com/bradblog (or something the tackle is) URL… a lot of people may well be lacking the story because of that, however it’s inevitable. i used to be scared whatever thing unhealthy came about to the weblog at the beginning. and naturally, extraordinary work, Brad! remark #fifty six [Permalink] …

Mark
mentioned on 12/7/2004 @ 1:03 pm PT…

WOW!! What a hoot. tell you what i’m gonna do with my big tax cut after I send some to the RNC. i’m going to purchase a lot of inventory in aluminum foil. You guys are actual wackos…..wonderful but wackos just the same. hey don’t take my opinion for it. Step again, take off your foil hats and skim this thread from true to bottom. good enough that you can put your foil again on now. keep up the decent work. Mark W…..still the PresidentBush/Rice08 remark #fifty seven [Permalink] …

Seth
spoke of on 12/7/2004 @ 1:04 pm PT…

and naturally, after I submit that, bradblog.com appears to be working once more. incredible. right here’s to hoping it stays that means! comment #fifty eight [Permalink] …

Lerdy
pointed out on 12/7/2004 @ 1:47 pm PT…

howdy every person!!! You might not believe this pic of Feeney and Jeb Bush. image of the year for bound. :O :O :O remark #fifty nine [Permalink] …

Lerdy
spoke of on 12/7/2004 @ 1:fifty one pm PT…

comment #60 [Permalink] …

Lerdy
stated on 12/7/2004 @ 1:fifty three pm PT…

comment #61 [Permalink] …

Lerdy
spoke of on 12/7/2004 @ 2:12 pm PT…

Feeney really prefers Optical Scan. check it out! Copyright instances Publishing Co. Mar 6, 2001 Gov. Jeb Bush on Monday pledged to push for cash and legal adjustments to repair Florida’s badly broken elections equipment. Senate President John McKay and condominium Speaker Tom Feeney didn’t attend. McKay bought a replica of the file when he arrived at the Capitol late Monday afternoon. apartment Speaker Feeney mentioned Monday he helps the optical-scan gadget, but he would choose to lend the funds to the forty one counties that need the new technology. He pointed out it be now not fair to have the state pay for the systems when other counties have already upgraded on their personal. "Are we prepared to spend $20-million if we are fixing a true issue with a true answer? completely sure," Feeney, R-Oviedo, stated. "Are we going to spend $20-million in order that we could believe respectable and go domestic and say, ‘do not be anxious, we took care of the problem?’ every thing’s still on the desk." Full article here. remark #sixty two [Permalink] …

definitely unhealthy false AFFIDAVIT
talked about on 12/7/2004 @ 3:42 pm PT…

examine this truly dangerous faked affidavit!!! These guys retain speakme concerning the "Sworn commentary" from some man who says he turned into askedto write a software hack… He doesn’t claim to have anything else to do with the 2004 Presidential election, but something. I seem to remember a scene in a movie, however I cannot remember what the movie turned into.within the film, a young lawyer lost an affidavit, so that they took the signature page from a distinct doc, and attached it to an affidavit without the precise signature web page. down load the doc.in case you are looking to overlay web page four text onto the equal phrases in the different pages, it’s unbelievably obtrusive.devoid of even going that a long way, just look at the historical past of page 4 in comparison to the rest.appear on the print great of web page four in comparison to the leisure.look at the margins of web page four compared to the relaxation. This has got to be one of the crucial WORST solid/hoax documents of all time. Is there the rest that the left is honest about? What a bunch of crap. Dan reasonably’s was greater remark #sixty three [Permalink] …

Eillene McWilliams

said on 12/7/2004 @ 7:14 pm PT…

i am hoping Mr. Curtis gets some insurance policy. We want more people like him to communicate out towards the government. comment #64 [Permalink] …

john h. higgins

talked about on 12/7/2004 @ 7:24 pm PT…

i was very impressed with the Clinton Curtis affidavit. i am an additional of these "wishful thinkers" hoping against hope that whatever thing will come up to show that G dumbya stole the 2004 election. I believe he did but I have no idea how he did it. I don’t suppose the application that Mr. Curtis wrote or one like it become always used to repair the election. i like his claim however an affidavit does not prove voter fraud. Nor does the introduction of a software that could achieve voter fraud. The proof will handiest be present in its use….and the election is over so may be complicated to prove any program become used to flip the vote. I trust that what Bev Harris is doing is more more likely to prove vote rigging than the rest available. i am hoping when she’s free in Florida that she can come to these important counties in Ohio and provides a hand there. It would not remember if the proof in all this does not take place till after the inauguration. If or not it’s proved beyond a doubt, G dumbya just receives moved from the White apartment to the big house…..with a bit of luck brother Jeb and Slippery Dick Cheney…the Halliburton felon…should be sharing a cell with him for a long time. an online related video camera may still be put in of their mobile so that anyone …from anyplace we’re, can sign in on them now and again simply to make certain the realm remains protected. good work Brad…hope you’re up for doing greater. Investigating Raymond Lemmey’s dying is an outstanding vicinity to beginning. To do this, why doesn’t each person e mail one in every of his colleagues Robert Clift an clift@dot.state.fl.us and ask him anything questions are evoked. Thanks jH comment #65 [Permalink] …

Moesie
mentioned on 12/7/2004 @ eight:59 pm PT…

Thanks Brad…extremely good job of investigating…let’s hopethat the Shrub and his gang do not get to the P.T.Bin the govt to hold Curtis… in case you ever are looking to exchange location, Boston would offer you tons to write down about…loads of corruption here..buried, however here! https://BradBlog.com/photos/emoticons/chuckle.gif you’re giving us all hope….. remark #sixty six [Permalink] …

Bjoern from GERMANY
observed on 12/9/2004 @ 8:07 am PT…

exquisite JOB! Greetings from Germany! i am watching the progress of the fraud discovery with a lot attention, and that i try to contact as many americans as feasible to tell them that the world might no longer be misplaced yet I pray customary even though I don’t accept as true with in God that Bush and his corrupt fukkfaces could be kicked out of the white apartment.. good luck!!!!!!! remark #67 [Permalink] …

tekki2k
pointed out on 12/9/2004 @ 10:21 am PT…

I knew there turned into sabotage and the programmer would comprehend exactly what became completed. youngsters, I in fact hope he saved a duplicate of the uncompiled code, or Karl Rove should be able to spin himself out of this one. although if the proof has been laid out, there is not any method he no one may spin out… the code, the documents assisting the procurement of such utility, and the proof that it was loaded onto machines used within the elections will should be idiot proof, and holy holidays, Bush his brother, this congressman and a lot of many others should still spend some time in the back of bars. comment #68 [Permalink] …

Jon Strayer
spoke of on 12/9/2004 @ 1:31 pm PT…

Brad, why does the fourth page appear different from the different three? Do you have a duplicate of the original? can you scan the whole issue in? comment #69 [Permalink] …

Brad
observed on 12/9/2004 @ 3:25 pm PT…

Please see my submit about why the Affidavit fourth web page appears distinct than the different three correct here. And let me know you probably have any additional questions about it. remark #70 [Permalink] …

visitor01
spoke of on 12/10/2004 @ 9:fifty five am PT…

Why try to suss out or panic concerning the ‘authenticity’ of this affadavit by means of analyzing the fonts, and many others? An affadavit by definition is on file. What’s presented right here will prove to be a real copy, or no longer, in very short order. Its a very distinct condition from alleged copies of documents which no person else can produce. What might be interesting while sickening might be to peer how lengthy the assault poodle department of the press will try to spoof the general public with this bogus argument just to are attempting to generate swift boat doubts. comment #71 [Permalink] …

Knight_Tyme
talked about on 12/17/2004 @ 7:46 am PT…

Be wary of Liberals Bearing BloggsBy Leo Johnson To all the honest bloggers available, consider youre under assault and your liked blogger-shpere may be hijacked through the leftist/liberal/socialist agenda i’ll offer to you, a listing of opinions on why I accept as true with that is set to occur, (for the liberally impaired, please be aware: opinions are not facts). Im neatly aware that bloggers are available all shapes, sizes and flavors; I (individually) thank God and the framers of the constitution for that. nevertheless Leftist/Socialist ought to thank Darwin, The DNC, Madonna (no foolish, the singer), Al Franklyn, little g god, MTV, mom Nature, PETA, The big apple instances, Random probability, The CBS information and naturally the holiest of all holies, the one and best actual god that each one leftist/liberal/socialist pray to, the ACLU [pronounced AK-Loo] (holy tune should play right here) in my opinion, i like the shorter route of; God and country adequate, good enough i do know Im way available in bias-opinion land however I simply needed to take that tangent, unwell get back to the point at hand. i know some of you’re already upset with me, but please let me present some records to bolster my OPINION. before I birth, i know that throwing statistics at a liberal is a lot like throwing holy water at a vampire, both will get you bulging eyes and forming mouths together with a barrage of profanity and in general un-intelligible feedback. but no count number, here it goes truth: Bloggers the place broadly credited for exposing the CBS memo-gate debacle, and together with that, came the first resounding ring to the end of the historical medias strangle cling on the news we digest. (thank you bloggers all over) truth: That recognition has additionally brought along bandwagon leaping, fair climate, politically motivated historic-media varieties jumping into the fray making an attempt to money-in on that awareness. Opinion: That cash-in may additionally not be in funds but in attempting to mold the brand new media right into a clone of the old media, hence holding manage (i do know Im on tangent again but I had to shut in on that point) fact: Bloggers have already been used by means of the leftist/liberal/socialist agencies. Case and point lower back before the election bloggers during the country the place posting articles claming plots and plan for the return of the draft. The whole theory of the draft returning was a ploy used by using the Democratic birthday celebration. They used bloggers and it labored! Now dont take my note for it look for your self during this big apple instances article (sure I did say big apple instances); October 6, 2004Bill to restore the Draft Is Defeated in the HouseBy CARL HULSE WASHINGTON, Oct. 5 – making an attempt to quiet fears of a return of the draft, the condo Republican leadership engaged in a hasty name-up of its own on Tuesday. The Republicans brought to the floor a Democratic-sponsored concept to reinstate necessary defense force provider and presided over its overwhelming defeat on a vote of 402 to 2. "We’re going to place a nail in that coffin," spoke of the apartment majority leader, consultant Tom prolong of Texas. He accused Democrats of generating opposition to President Bush – specifically on college campuses – by way of raising the thought that the draft might be re-centered after the November election to supply troops for carrier in Iraq. Democrats had been outraged on the tactic, charging Republicans with a cynical political ploy on a count number that merited greater thoughtful hearings and debate. The Democrats originallyintroduced the measure early final year as a means to protest the war, even before it all started, and to highlight how low- and center-revenue americans shoulder tons of the burden of serving within the military. "it is a prostitution of the legislative method to take a major situation and use it for political applications on the eve of the election just to say they’re against the draft," mentioned consultant Charles B. Rangel, Democrat of long island, the writer of the bill, who ended up balloting in opposition t it. With the militia strained via its operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, speak of a return of the draft – discontinued in 1973 all over the Vietnam warfare – has persevered, fueled via email and web chatter warning of a new draft as soon as the election is concluded. The activist community Rock the Vote, which seeks to register younger americans to vote, has also broadcast public service announcements pointing to the draft as a crucial campaign challenge. individuals of Congress are constantly requested concerning the theory as smartly, frequently through concerned folks. "here is the difficulty so as to now not go away," talked about consultant Jim McDermott, Democrat of Washington. He and different Democrats counseled once more on Tuesday that Mr. Bush’s re-election might mean a return of the draft, because the administration is already calling back reservists and halting the discharge of military personnel. Senator John Kerry, the Democratic presidential candidate, has said such strikes as a backdoor draft. "How big a step is it from the place we are at this time to the president announcing it’s the countrywide hobby that everyone serves?" requested Mr. McDermott. Republicans portrayed such claims as a part of a pre-election fraud. "The purpose we are doing this is to show the hoax of the year, which has been needlessly scaring young people," mentioned representative Duncan Hunter of California, chairman of the Armed functions Committee. Administration officers including Mr. Bush and defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld have stated they have absolutely no plans to restoration the draft and trust that the all-volunteer armed forces is the correct strategy to container troops. both of them have reiterated that position in fresh days. "We won’t have a draft so long as i am the president of the us," Mr. Bush observed to applause from a crowd in Iowa on Monday. "We should not have a draft," Mr. Rumsfeld noted all through a radio interview with Sean Hannity. "we now have got, you understand, 295 million americans during this country and we now have an lively drive of about 1.four million and we’re having no concern in any respect attracting and maintaining the individuals that we should serve within the defense force." Some Democrats referred to it became the administration’s lack of credibility due to the failure to locate chemical and organic weapons in Iraq and its mishandling of the aftermath that became to blame for be concerned concerning the draft. "The president’s international coverage is scaring the kids of this nation," talked about representative Tim Ryan, Democrat of Ohio. The information superhighway site visitors on the draft frequently cites as evidence of a future draft the measure backed by way of Mr. Rangel, which might require two years of militia service or the choice of national service, as well as its companion within the Senate subsidized with the aid of Senator Ernest F. Hollings, Democrat of South Carolina. The concern has also gotten an airing from Rock the Vote. officers of the group have observed the draft is a discipline that should be addressed in detail through the presidential contenders. "We are not asserting there is going to be a draft," observed Jay Strell, a spokesman for the community. "What we are asserting is we need to have an open a decent communicate about this in keeping with the facts." With lawmakers conscious about the abilities political ramifications of backing a draft, the Rangel measure languished without a good deal attention except the Republican leadership decided to drive it to the floor to make a political factor. One lawmaker spoke in choose of the invoice, saying it changed into time Congress gave some notion to future defense force manpower wants."I consider we should beginning this presently," noted representative John Murtha of Pennsylvania, a leading Democrat on military concerns. He turned into joined in backing the bill via consultant Fortney Stark, Democrat of California. Senate officials said they’d no intention of performing on an analogous concept, however the Democratic leader, Senator Tom Daschle, noted he doubted the condo vote would put the depend to rest. "i’d expect you’re going to continue to see debates in regards to the viability of a draft as we flow forward," Mr. Daschle saidFact: simplest two Congressmen voted for the draft and that they had been Dem-o-crates (the vote turned into 400 to 2). in case you note, it turned into the Democrats that drafted the bill within the 1st vicinity. It become the Democrats that raised the challenge and it changed into the Democrats that leaked the whole aspect to bloggers and it turned into Democrats that cried foul when the Republicans introduced it to a vote with a view to defeat it. Im sorry to assert, however many bloggers got duped, plain and easy and with that success liberals see a fertile panorama for future plans. truth: Its going on again, the newest Leftist ploy is to spew out the crazy idea that the election turned into rigged on a nation wide degree. Now i will be able to see many of my leftist friends obtainable foaming at the mouth ready to pounce, but before you leftist get your phrases of Wisdoms by using fourteen olds book to cite from, let me make my case. My pals and i have been posting and counter posting one one other debating on that very subject. (in my view I believe Im profitable) in here postings: http://samesidetwocoins….of-2004-welcome-again.phpIn the above posting Matthew and Joel cut and pasted an editorial by Larry Chin that laid out claims of a republican rigged election. (respectable fiction I found it very pleasing) Heres a little; "they have got been given thousands and thousands of dollars through the Bush regime to comprehensive a sweeping computerization of balloting machines that had been simply used in the 2004 election. The know-how concerned had a trial run all the way through the 2002 mid-term elections. Georgia had Diebold machines in each precinct. because of this, a favored Democratic governor and senator have been each unseated in what the media known as an "wonderful" sixteen % swing. "Diebold’s Walden O’Dell, a correct Bush fundraiser, publicly committed himself to delivering his home state Ohio’s votes to Bush. At Diebold, the election division is run through Bob Urosevich. Bob’s brother, Todd, is a excellent executive at "rival" ES&S. The brothers have been initially staked through Howard Ahmanson, a member of the Council For national coverage, a correct-wing steering group stacked with Bush proper believers. Ahmanson is additionally one of the bagmen at the back of the extremist Christian Reconstruction circulate, which advocates the theocratic takeover of american democracy. http://peanuts.rizzn.com…out-rigged-elections.phpI refuted such claims with my posting (above) that in part spoke of: reality 1:there’s 3,007 entities named "County"sixteen Boroughs in Alaska11 Census Areas in Alaska (for areas not prepared into Boroughs by using the State)sixty four Parishes in Louisiana42 unbiased Cities (1 in Maryland, 1 in Missouri, 1 in Nevada, and the the rest in Virginia)1 District – the Federal District or District of Columbia.Puerto Rico – 78 MunicipiosU.S. Virgin Islands – 2 DistrictsGuam – 19Election Districts Northern Mariana Islands – 17Districts American Samoa – 5 DistrictsThere are over 191,000 voting precincts.(source, USGS) http://interactive2.usgs…ry/get_answer.asp?identity=785 reality 2:these numbers would translate into 3,261 Supervisors of Elections, plus that each supervisor would have employees (ranging from 6 to thousands, every) plus each voting district would have a canvassing board with at the very least 3 people each and every (from both events and or an "impartial choose"), each state would have a Secretary of State or comptroller to supervise the effects earlier than submitting them to the us federal governments plus each and every birthday party has delegates to account for each electoral vote. let alone the 191,000 vote casting precincts that every has ballot worker’s and polling observers each. that would be by means of conservative averages contain a total of two,194,570 co-conspirators. (that’s 652,400 SOE personnel + 13,044 canvassing board contributors + 50 Secretaries of State + 1,076 Delegates + 1,528,000 poll location worker’s and observers). Who would need rigged utility? simply let the co-conspirators vote.(source, http://www.us.gov/ , my calculator and a few general feel) http://samesidetwocoins….we-had-fair-election.phpAfter some goading I bought Joel to reply, however sadly it changed into yet yet another cut and paste, of Dr. Steven F. Freemans article from buzzflash.com. If youll be mindful: He maintains referring to buzz flash as his simple source. Heres an excerpt; reality #1The Exit polls (that are used more and more in Democracies internationally to insure fair elections like in Ukraine) had been perpetually off in desire of Bush in Key state after key state on the nighttime of election. unusually enough, In "The Unexplained Exit poll Discrepancy," Dr. Steven F. Freeman a Professor on the tuition of Pennsylvania says: "As plenty as we are able to say in social science that anything is unattainable, it is impossible that the discrepancies between envisioned and specific vote counts in the three crucial battleground states [Ohio, Florida, and Pennsylvania] of the 2004 election might have been because of possibility or random error." the percentages of these exit ballot statistical anomalies happening accidentally are, in line with Freeman, "250,000,000 to at least one." this is 250 MILLION to 1. study the entire document athttp://www.buzzflash.com…eleven/Expldiscrpv00oPt1.pdf Let me pause for a second I must ask, what algorithm did the good doctor use, to come up with the 250 million to at least one components? I guess well in no way be aware of, someway the Doc didn’t encompass or mention it. http://peanuts.rizzn.com…ks-for-statistics-film-at.phpI replied within the above submit with the aid of demonstrating how a conspiracy in the other direction become extra possible; (i wanted to play liberal that day) however, nonetheless, to rig the exit polling it will only take a fraction of co-conspirators to tug it off. in line with Edison/Mitofsky http://www.exit-poll.internet/faq.html (the individuals that ran the poll) the exit polling changed into, partially, as follows; what number of polling locations will be for your sample?sample sizes range from state to state. There could be 1,480 exit ballot precincts right through the nation. in addition, there may be 2,995 short count number precincts where the vote count might be gathered. The vote count number comes from the precinct vote casting officials after the pollsclose.If I put 3 pollsters at each precinct, that would be 4440 pollsters (1480 x 3) and yet a further hand filled with technicians to do the brief count, however let’s go wild and say that the techs aren’t pollsters and it would take yet another 2000 greater. That brings the entire to, 6440 (4440+2000). Now, let’s take a look on the change, 2,194,570 to 6440 it truly is 340 times smaller. Which neighborhood would be less complicated to handle? Oh incidentally, the 6440 are employed by one private company. the two.2 million would go over thousands of jurisdictions of varying political parties and bias. http://samesidetwocoins….-proof-is-in-pudding.phpThen Matthew pressed the CRTL-C key to reduce and paste yet an additional article;Cobb Sues Blackwell in Federal courtroom over Ohio Recount http://peanuts.rizzn.com…als-make-unhealthy-pudding.phpI responded with greater data to refute Cobbs claims and i put Matthew, to task; Why not are attempting doing a little research and stop just, chopping and pasting different americans’s articles. I take note, the usefulness of slicing and pasting information from numerous postings, but you might be simply the use of opinion and biased posting. Let me exhibit you a far better way… You cut and pasted a paragraph or two from a piece of writing from the green party’s web site, http://www.votecobb.org/…004/dec/pr2004-12-02.phpNow you would must admit that or not it’s a partisan view. but then again you might be a liberal and you may bend general experience into liberal sense. Now having said that, I went to the State of Ohio’s professional election recount website http://election.sos.stat…/RaceDetail.aspx?race=PPand obtained the following effects. (these are what we would want to call data) President/vp office Candidate birthday party Votes % ofVotes Statewide Totals Bush, George W. Republican 2,858,727 50.eighty twopercentKerry, John F. Democratic 2,739,952 forty eight.70p.cBadnarik, Michael four,695 0.26%Peroutka, Michael Anthony 11,907 0.21%Cobb, David Keith -WI 186 0.00%Schriner, Joe -WI 114 0.00p.cHarris, James -WI 22 0.00p.cDuncan, Richard A. -WI 16 0.00%Zych, Thomas F. -WI 10 0.00p.cParker, John T. -WI 2 0.00percentPrecincts Reporting: 5,625,631 a hundred.00percentPlease be aware that your "proof candidate" bought a complete of 186 votes and Kerry gained 17,708 votes. this is together with counting the provisional ballots. http://samesidetwocoins….es-bend-over-for-massive.phpJoel then took over the reduce and pasting job, (I believe Matthews fingers received tired) and posted a short line or two that become in most cases a hyperlink to; http://bradblogtoo.blogs…-blog-whistleblower.html i hope you still with me. i do know the path is a little bit bewildering, but Im attempting to set up a sample here, no its no longer that Joel and Matthew are fairly first rate with the CTRL-C / CRTL-V keys… but youre shut. Its the incontrovertible fact that they keep the usage of postings from liberal biased BLOGGER sites, and presenting them as facts. because it turns out, that link became to yet a further left leaning web site and i figured oh neatly unwell examine it, (it became essentially verbatim replica of a piece of writing posted on www.onlinejournal.com.) I grew to be very fascinated once I came throughout this tidbit inside that article; https://bradblog.com/Doc…/CC_Affidavit_120604.pdf(A link to a PDF it truly is on buzzflash.com, Yep you guessed a leftist web-log website). As I examine it, i was getting ready my retort to dispel the total proposal that a conspiracy may be deliberate again in 2000, to rig a future election by using, yet to be created utility on yet to be designed terminals in yet to be introduced states the usage of Microsofts visible simple as a move platform program (grin). I had a smile on my faceIt turned into going to be an easy goal. but then I came to the final two pages of this so known as AFFIDAVIT. It became a flash again of CBSs Memos. The closing web page doesnt even come near matching the other three pages the colour of the paper turned into wrong the margins and the typeset didnt fit. but this fraud became in reverse, it turned into the bloggers faking the documents! Now heres the payoff, if we bloggers are to hold or elevate our present status then we deserve to take a look at what we put accessible and what our peers submit and re-publish. We deserve to make honest and RESPECTIVE commentary on the issues and if we are able to discover records to bolster our point of view then we should still via all capacity use it. all and sundry will on occasion find that we trust in an argument, a perception that goes appropriate all the way down to the core of our being, but we cant show it as reality. Now here is where we should be in a position to accept it for what it’s, a perception or thought that is not yet a reality. We may still think free to categorical it as an opinion. A valued opinion, but nonetheless simply an opinion however for goodness sake, we are able to certainly not consider the manufacturing of information or promote using those tainted facts by using posting them somewhere else. For the Leftist Liberals themselves, they’ve yet a deeper issue. They need to take a glance at their complete method. maybe they may still search for true conspiracies happening right in entrance of them, just like the UN Oil for food program or those 500 chinese Christians which are killed every day. however alias Liberals only like to seek, or create conspiracies that just turn up to coincide with their leftist agenda. I expect and hope for hardy responses to this posting, however mind you, appear on the element of this text and the problem at hand and please use data to aid your response because in flip i will be able to. unwell depart you with this idea, lots of you can also disagree with my politics and outlook however optimistically none of you settle for the concept Do anything to win no count number what. If we fall into that state of mind, we wont be protectors of the brand new Media but instead neatly simply be a bunch of Dan Rathers presiding over the brand new CBS. Posted to Rizzn.com / Buzzflash.com and with a bit of luck online journal.com comment #72 [Permalink] …

Martie Anderson
talked about on 12/20/2004 @ 7:59 am PT…

i am hoping that lots of people learn about this and this receives investigated thoroughly. i will be able to tell you that the condo and the Sentate in Florida tried to circulate a legislations asserting that it became "unlawful" to have a recount in Flordia elections. I known as myself to investigate this because I could not agree with it became authentic and acquired in touch with the committee in the condominium this bill became assigned to. fortunately, it in no way came out of committee but when the past holds genuine, the Republicans will try once again. remark #seventy three [Permalink] …

Paul
observed on 12/20/2004 @ 8:04 am PT…

John h. higgins wrote:> i’m another of these "wishful thinkers" hoping towards hope that whatever thing will come as much as prove that G dumbya stole the 2004 election whats up, kook fringe John, Bush didn’t steal the election! respectable comments Knight_Tyme. Boerne from Germany wrote:> I pray prevalent though I don’t agree with in Godand…Rambler wrote:> If here’s proper, if one day soon we see bush and his cohorts in orange penitentiary jumpsuits, i could birth believing in God. In anticipation of my conversion i’m praying it occurs in case you don’t trust in God, who are you praying to? God will not listen to your prayers anyway. You should get right with God or you will be left somewhere else. There is just one way to God and one way to Heaven, and that is through Jesus. Jesus noted "i’m the manner, the certainty, and the life; no person involves the daddy but with the aid of me." John 14:6 remark #seventy four [Permalink] …

Brad
talked about on 12/20/2004 @ 1:57 pm PT…

Paul, as you know, if you definitely troubled to study Knight_Tyme’s precise cut and pasted feedback, they are wrong from proper to bottom. (And the passage about "Why no longer try doing some research and forestall just, reducing and pasting other individuals’s articles." is, of path, exceptionally embarrassing for him/her). by means of only one instance, the reduce and pasted textual content mentions this concerning the affidavit we posted right here with this text firstly: "The last web page doesnt even come close to matching the different 3 pages the color of the paper was wrong the margins and the typeset didnt suit. however this fraud turned into in reverse, it changed into the bloggers faking the documents!" As any one who’s been following this story now is aware of well, the affidavit is certainly not fake, and has been given to members of congress, and used for the basis of Curtis’ public sworn testimony given to Judiciary Committee member closing week. (For greater on that "mysterious fourth page of the affidavit, see this BRAD blog article.) In different phrases, Knight_tyme’s makes an attempt to use erroneous, reduce and paste, and albeit just made-up advice in an attempt to "discredit" our reporting, and your naivety in agreeing along with his silly advice have both been miserable failures, and only additional to bolster the legitimacy of Clint Curtis’ case. keep attempting although! And greater luck subsequent time! comment #seventy five [Permalink] …

Leo Johnson
observed on 12/20/2004 @ four:fifty seven pm PT…

Brad, i am Leo Johnson and i’m also Knight_Tyme, (thats my blogger name) I wrote the whole article save for the postings that I credited and used those cut and pasted postings most effective to ascertain my position. I took pains to make sure I outlined that in detail. So once once again youre making postings on stuff you havent checked out yet, and also you overlooked the whole reason I wrote the article. I take note, thats the way liberals work it, you be aware of, the complete Dont seem at the statistics seem to be elsewhere aspect. i’m now not wrong, and the whole theory that the Curtis PDF isnt a fraud is ludicrous. The web page that consists of the signature is completely diverse from the outdated 3 pages. although the content of the PDF is what Mr. Curtis claims to have accomplished, it makes no difference, the element of my article became that, as a blogger, make sure you take time to conceder what you post earlier than you submit it. in case you write and article and within that article you present a PDF (a PDF that’s the anchor of the complete article) that goes to be questioned and examined and it, (the PDF) has obtrusive inconsistencies. then you definitely ought to settle for the replies that open you and your web page to questions of fraudulent postings. unwell rephrase it. So youll bear in mind what it’s that Im making an attempt to say. however he did signal an affidavit its most effective HIS be aware that hes testifying to. It in itself is not proof, and no count number what you say that PDF, is not the documentation he signed. That PDF is a document that become pieced collectively by means of somebody else. Regardless if the election turned into rigged or now not, that PDF will now not show it for you. You and whoever else used it, has blown that possibility, because everyone unnoticed to make use of due diligence in vetting the document. let’s imagine a pristine edition show up its self the next day. i’ll nonetheless be overshadowed by way of the one you offered past. Youre making the equal ancient tried blunders that the majority liberals make. You cant settle for what is, and also you become so angered by way of it you complain about it, after which you believe that by hook or by crook if you retain saying anything it will become real. Then, if somebody else agrees with you that by hook or by crook that becomes proof and the next you comprehend you and you associates are off to the races slapping one one other on the back claiming some sort of victory. while we conservatives just go about looking at the facts (you bear in mind them) and we use common sense and the laws of likelihood to make a reasonable conclusions, and blow you entire thought away. For the record, most of every little thing I stated here is my opinion, and it most effective has to be my opinion. Thats since the burden of proof is upon you my buddy. You and also you acquaintances have cooked up the theory that the election turned into rigged. smartly, youd superior show it or shut up and be cautious while you attempting to find that proof as a result of have been looking at and if youre correct then smartly accept it and compliment you for you efforts. in any other case we will problem you and put you to the verify. identification like to make this clear, Im no longer trying to claim that you manufactured the PDF; Im saying that you just did yourself and your cause a disservice by using it. Then by extension youre also harming all bloggers by using diluting the mission reality. Leo JohnsonKnight_Tyme@hotmail.com comment #76 [Permalink] …

Brad
referred to on 12/20/2004 @ 5:37 pm PT…

respectable to peer from Leo! > i am Leo Johnson and i’m additionally Knight_Tyme, (thats my blogger> identify) I wrote> the complete article store for the postings that I credited and> used those reduce> and pasted postings most effective to verify my position. I took pains> to make certain I> outlined that in detail.>> So once again youre making postings on stuff you havent> checked out yet, As you will word in the other thread by which you reduce and pasted the equal contacts, I requested on your counsel on the place "Leo Johnson" had posted that counsel orginally, so that I may reply at once to "him" and let him be aware of that he was fallacious. That *you* are Leo Johnson (whatever you didn’t element out when you used an pseudonym to publish your article, as if it changed into written by means of somebody else…You definitely could have used "Leo Johnson" in case you left the remark, but chose — for whatever thing intent — to hide at the back of a pseudonym) is brilliant, and i hope you will post as "yourself" next time you need to go on the checklist in this count number. > and also you ignored the whole reason I wrote the article. I> be aware, thats> the way liberals work it, you understand, the complete Dont analyze> the information look> somewhere else thing. Ironic remark, Leo. but i’d encourage you to element out a single "truth" in re: my reporting on the Clint Curtis count it truly is either incorrect, or used to inform folks to "seem elsewhere". Your skepticism is encouraged. Your cynicism and unsupported mis-advice isn’t. > i’m now not incorrect, and the whole conception that the Curtis PDF isnt a> fraud is> ludicrous. The page that contains the signature is completely> diverse from> the old 3 pages. if you read the hyperlink I gave you to the article discussing that "Mysterious Fourth web page" you may understand through now that you just were incorrect. The PDF is not a "fraud" and this kind of charge has lengthy ago been confirmed to be "ludicrous", really. in case you wish to dispute the suggestions *in* the affidavit, that is great, and that i appear ahead to your facts demonstrating that any of it is wrong. to date, i have been capable of finding none. but your backtracking now to claim that you just failed to call the affidavit frauduelent is simply foolish, Leo. you did. you’re wrong. And this could go lots more straightforward for all and sundry when you are inclined to admit that a whole lot. For the list, and for the pals you’ve got CC’d. right here’s the particular text from "Knight_Tyme’s" twice posted feedback: "however this fraud turned into in reverse, it become the bloggers faking the documents!" in case you have facts that in any manner indicates that *this* "blogger" at the least become "faking the files" i’d motivate you to demonstrate it us, or otherwise, admit that you are effortlessly one hundred% wrong in re: the above commentary. > although the content of the PDF is what Mr. Curtis claims to> have done, it> makes no change, the aspect of my article changed into that, as a> blogger, you> should still take time to conceder what you put up earlier than you put up it. if you’ve have afflicted to really examine what I’ve written on this story, you can be aware of neatly that no longer simplest have I regarded what i might posted "before" it become posted, however I vetted the suggestions with a few authorities, and have at all times adopted up with extra detail for the past two weeks in accordance with reams of public information, established correspondences between most of the gamers during this case, wide interviews with a number of other events accepted with the case, and different newspapers articles on the be counted. All of which extend again at least so far as three years in this case. once again, I await your proof demonstrating that this case was not well regarded earlier than it changed into posted here. > for those who write and article and inside that article you offer> a PDF (a PDF> this is the anchor of the whole article) that goes to be> puzzled and> examined and it, (the PDF) has obtrusive inconsistencies. You> then must> accept the replies that open you and your site to questions> of fraudulent postings. I accept such "replies" wholeheartedly, and — truly — have inspired them on many occassions! You did not "question" youngsters. You "cited". And — paradoxically enough — with none facts, and opposite to many articles already written on the subject which reveal that you just have been without problems incorrect, even whereas charging that i used to be the one who posted earlier than due to the fact that what i was saying. > unwell rephrase it. So youll be aware what it’s that Im> attempting to claim.> even if he did signal an affidavit its simplest HIS be aware that hes> testifying to.> It in itself isn’t proof, and no rely what you say that> PDF, isn’t the> documentation he signed. That PDF is a document that turned into> pieced together through someone else. That isn’t a "rephrasing", Leo. it really is a totally different charge. if you need to make that cost, I haven’t any difficulty with it, and — as I even have encouraged others to do (as has Curtis himself) — I welcome your investigation and any extra fabric or proof you may also ought to offer to suggest that there are causes to disbelief the allegations that Curtis has made. I welcome your efforts to do so, and seem to be forward to what you might also locate in the be counted. but to try and cowl your ass with the aid of suggestion you failed to imply something that you damn neatly be aware of that you did, most effective makes your case all the more weak. > Regardless if the election was rigged or now not, that PDF will> no longer prove it for you. no longer sure where you acquired the theory that I ever advised that it did. > You and whoever else used it, has blown that opportunity,> as a result of everyone> left out to make use of due diligence in vetting the doc. foolish, Leo. now we have already mentioned this. It turned into vetted, I saw the normal. As have now numerous others from the greatest media corporations to individuals in both the U.S. condominium and the Senate. > lets say a pristine> edition occur its self the next day. i will nonetheless be> overshadowed with the aid of the one> you presented previous. If individuals like you need to discredit the entire story in response to whatever fully proven to be wrong, then i am certain you are going to make each effort to achieve this. I may, although, indicate you try to disprove the exact allegations made considering the fact that the affidavit itself has already smartly proven to be genuine, fashioned, and legally binding through scores, if not a whole bunch of media groups, elected officials and attorneys at legislation. > Youre making the same old tried blunders that almost all liberals> make. as soon as again, such silly attempts to discredit assistance you can also not want to examine as being invalid because it has been pronounced on by means of someone you regard as "liberal" only weakens your already weak case. You might also wish to are trying and refute the message, as an alternative of the messenger. but i could leave that to you. > You cant> settle for what is, and you develop into so angered by way of it you whinge> about it, and> you then consider that somehow if you keep saying anything it> will turn into true. Heheh…good day, Pot? it be the Kettle on line one! > Then, if someone else is of the same opinion with you that by some means that becomes> proof and the subsequent you be aware of you and you pals are off to the> races slapping> one yet another on the back claiming some variety of victory. whereas we> conservatives just go about searching on the statistics (you> remember them) and we> use good judgment and the legal guidelines of likelihood to make a reasonable> conclusions, and> blow you whole thought away. I appear forward to your "statistics" in addition to your "common sense and legal guidelines of likelihood" to offer cost effective conclusions during this remember. unless then, Leo, you might be blowing tons of unsupported wind with no shred of evidence to back up your unsupported claims in this remember. > For the list, most of everything I referred to here is my opinion,> and it only> has to be my opinion. Thats since the burden of proof is> upon you my chum. To do what? To demonstrate that your opinions are mistaken? I have achieved so. My pal. > You and you friends have cooked up the idea that the> election was rigged. i’m no longer bound who my "buddies" are during this be counted. but I look ahead to your records demonstrating that I actually have claimed this "election turned into rigged". > neatly, youd more suitable show it or shut up and be cautious> whilst you> looking for that proof because have been looking at and if youre> right then> well accept it and compliment you for you efforts. in any other case we> will problem> you and put you to the test. in some way I even have a feeling that you’ll praise nothing, as lengthy as it does not show the outcome you’ll want to trust in. That referred to, I don’t have any activity in "shutting up" about these concerns, but *you* may also need to achieve this in order to hold from searching so foolish the next time you submit unsupported and totally incorrect information on this weblog. > identification want to make this clear, Im not attempting to claim that you just> manufactured the> PDF; Im announcing that you just did your self and your cause a> disservice by using> it. well, in reality, it truly is now not what you referred to at all. however I keep in mind that’s what you might be trying to use to save face now. > Then by means of extension youre additionally harming all bloggers by> diluting the mission actuality. Um, seize a mirror, Leo. remark #seventy seven [Permalink] …

Leo Johnson
mentioned on 12/21/2004 @ 1:00 am PT…

Brad, in case you study my article Brad you could have referred to that I used my name correct beneath the title. I made NO makes an attempt to conceal who i used to be nor did i exploit a pseudonym. Your gadget asks for a name and if it can remember me and my auto fill posted my blogger name and email address. You may additionally have made an inexpensive assumption that it became one of two americans however you made the UN-within your means assumption to base your response on that assumption (a response that prevented the point of the article in the first location). You started out good enough, you used MY e mail tackle (that I provided to you), to correctly contact ME. In that electronic mail you’re making some flawed accretions and requested who Leo Johnson became. however instead of ready to bring together that guidance you when forward and posted your completely attention diverting response. Thats on you Brad and not rely how upset you get. You cant change it. You moved before you knew. but then again youre a liberal, its expected. you can now claim a tiny victory, you used one of the crucial oldest liberal strategies to DIVERT as a substitute of engaging in a fair debate, and so far Ive used three paragraphs (and counting) to reply your misdirection. up to now youve acted like a customary liberal identical to the own category of responses you given me thus far. You tried to take apart my final response line by means of line to be able to make your self appear first rate in what’s believe to be a pseudo aspect counter factor fashion however unfortunately youve failed Brad, any vacationer of this web site can study for themselves and its obtrusive that youre tiring to mislead and misdirect your readers. Now lets get to the reality half you requested for Brad: (i love this stuff) truth 1: You misinformed your readers. in your response you alluded to suggesting that you made NO claims that the election was rigged through writing but I appear ahead to your information demonstrating that I actually have claimed this "election become rigged". who is making an attempt to fool whom? Your entire site is a towering edifice to biased, crazed anti-Bush, liberalism. Your website promotes a e-book that claims President Bush is tiring to establish a Holy Roman Empire, Your web site income Anti-bush gifts, You website has an ad that ask forHELP america RECOUNT, and that ad linkshttp://www.helpamericarecount.orgIf you arent making that declare then what often is the entire aspect of your article and its false affidavit? Come on Brad that turned into too easy. fact 2: I dont need to prove anything, you do. I actually have the luxurious to challenge your claims as a result of (i know this hurts) George W Bush gained the election and its your aspect that making the claims and its up to your aspect to show it. Now dont even are attempting to say youre no longer making that declare. (Please check with truth num 1) truth 3: The Affidavit is on the very least questionable or worse, a fake. Being that you used a mismatching affidavit and you have no longer been capable of deliver us with a group of four matching pages of the real affidavit then it will probably dangle no weight and may be treated with suspicion. fact four: I dont deserve to refute the affidavit. after I study the affidavit and realized it was false then why may still I or any one else waste time on it? (Please confer with CBS Memo-gate) The burden turned into to call out all and sundry who changed into the usage of it and featuring it as some type of proof. reality 5: It concerns no longer. If it turns out that Curtis did indeed make any such document it proves not a thing. if you had been to make use of good judgment, youd ought to treat such a claim with suspicion after which ask Why did you wait 5 years to claim some thing?are you able to provide us with the application?where is the cash you was paid and can you prove why it turned into paid to you?How did you write a hack for software that become yet to be written?How did you expect what OS, database and which enterprise would use the yet to be designed machines on yet to be decided hardware and its drivers?are you able to demonstrate on a true computing device (any that continues to be in DEMOCRATIC and Republican precincts right through the nation) on how are you in a position to stay away from detection of the hacked application?How did you train the election officials to run the fraud hobbies and might you deliver the names of these officers and or the trainers?are you able to rewrite that movements nowadays? pretty please, with sugar on good?How come, with you being this sort of Genius Mr. Curtis, (a genius that was capable of write such astounding code) you werent in a position to make a copy of the source code to guard yourself?Why shouldnt we conceder the incontrovertible fact that your making all these claims towards your former bosses that sued you and also you them?Why is it that you blew your whistle AFTER the election!!?!!!???!? if you may answer these few questions then and simply then youll have anything to focus on. otherwise save that affidavit to your unidentified flying object. reality 6: Youve been duped. Youre biased and youre hunting for a conspiracy. You might have easily provided that PDF and made clear statements that mentioned what his claims are and offer room to look for actual proof. however as an alternative you set sirens and Whistle Blower headlines and your BRAD emblems all over the pages and declare an exclusive whereas others like Buzzflash.com and Onlinejounal.com and www.lefterer.com has been mentioning that their not certain yet and a few have reporting on it for weeks http://www.lefterer.com/?web page=characteristic&identity=139 fact 7: Curtis has his personal site. He registered on godaddy.com please seem to be. Registrant:clint curtisP.O. container 955Woodville, Florida 32362United States Registered via: GoDaddy.com (http://www.godaddy.com)area name: JUSTAFLYONTHEWALL.COMCreated on: 27-Jan-04Expires on: 27-Jan-05Last up to date on: 13-Sep-04 Administrative Contact:curtis, clint clintcurtis@clintcurtis.comP.O. container 955Woodville, Florida 32362United States8502100047Technical Contact:curtis, clint clintcurtis@clintcurtis.comP.O. container 955Woodville, Florida 32362United States8502100047 area servers in listed order:WSC1.JOMAX.NETWSC2.JOMAX.internet. And on HIS own website he doesnt post his own Affidavit!!! http://www.justaflyonthewall.com/votefraud.html and if you desire do a www.whois.com lookup on www.justaflyonthewall.com truth eight: Mr. Curtis had his probability. He created his web site back in Jan 2004 and it might have used his site to post his claims neatly before the elections but come what may with the entire advice he had, he waited AFTER the election to assert anythingand used YOU. Brad to do it (see truth 6) fact 9: Youre in a Bind. you have chased this story (that supported your bias) with so a whole lot passion you didn’t use due diligence and an awful lot like CBS you must locate some proof to validate your involvement and dedication. Youre now making claims to have spoken to officials that validate Curtis claims but you dont present those officials names. reality 10: visual simple is not a go platform capable software! I personal a pc business and run a web hosting company and my personnel and i code for ourselves the use of VB.internet /ASP /JAVA /RAIL /Hypertext Preprocessor /FLASH motion SCRIPT/ RSS/ COLDFUSION /PEARL and we laughed out loud after we heard that Curtis made claims that he used VB to put in writing a pass platform program. VB and ASP will no longer run on Unix/Linux programs and of all of the choices VB often is the worst. in case you wanted to create a pass platform code youd must have some thought what distinctive OSes it would be operating beneath, after which discover the APIs or Hooks that would will let you run you code. Then youd need to write a OS impartial set of drivers that might seek advice from the contact monitor hardware that reads your finger press on a yet to be designed platform after which you have to comprehend what variable/arrays they may use and/or if the contact monitor uses HEX / DECIMAL or STRING values to move the data back to the OS.. If Curtis became able to pull of this he neglected his calling, hed be the worlds surest programmer. Now, in case you query that he purposed VB study Curtis own web site: http://www.justaflyonthe…com/votefraudprogram.htm please observe that he used VB5, and heres the code he presents as an example www.JustAFlyOnTheWall.comVoteFraudCode.zip reality 11: You knew in regards to the VB issue and chose to disregard it. Mark Hopkins of Rizzn.web / Rizzn.com posted a comment to you that made point out of the VB problem and you refuted Mr. Hopkins aspect when you may have typed in http://www.justaflyonthe…com/votefraudprogram.htmin you browser window and located out for your self. however as a substitute you typed out your biased articles. I just obtained begun Brad and i will offer you extra if need be. Wait!, I havent even gotten to the half that you just suggest that I backed away from my very own feedback by hook or by crook. I did indeed say that the doc was faked however I graciously gave you the benefit of the doubt that you simply the place no longer without delay concerned, smartly, now that you simply prodded me to appear deeper, Im not so certain. Leo Johnson Knight_tyme@hotmail.com P.S. i’m hoping you rethink you place and look deeper into Mr. Curtiss agenda. remark #seventy eight [Permalink] …

Brad
said on 12/21/2004 @ 2:00 am PT…

Leo, you’re so foolish. we are going to set apart your nonsense that your name "Knight_Tyme" became used since it turned into auto-remembered via a system on which you have in no way posted before. And that you simply posted your initial article as if it became "by" somebody other than yourself. Frankly, this newest backpedal of yours isn’t value the hassle to even focus on. That talked about, i used to be in fact going to respond to your "facts" part aspect-by means of-factor except I obtained to this area: "Why did you wait five years to assert anything?can you supply us with the software?where is the funds you turned into paid and might you show why it became paid to you?How did you write a hack for software that changed into yet to be written?How did you are expecting what OS, database and which enterprise would use the yet to be designed machines on yet to be decided hardware and its drivers?can you exhibit on a real laptop (any that is still in DEMOCRATIC and Republican precincts right through the country) on how are you in a position to evade detection of the hacked software?How did you educate the election officers to run the fraud activities and may you give the names of these officers and or the trainers?are you able to rewrite that movements these days? relatively please, with sugar on precise?How come, with you being such a Genius Mr. Curtis, (a genius that become in a position to write such miraculous code) you werent capable of make a duplicate of the supply code to protect yourself?Why shouldnt we conceder the undeniable fact that your making all these claims towards your former bosses that sued you and also you them?Why is it that you just blew your whistle AFTER the election!!?!!!???!?" …Which published that you have not even examine my first article on the Clint Curtis affidavit, tons less the boatloads of subsequent reporting I’ve achieved on it! Had you achieved so, each one of the questions you requested above would had been answered (although most of them do not need been asked within the first area seeing that they don’t have any groundwork within the precise facts of the Clint Curtis story). there may be a pleasant handy to make use of "sidebar" at right listing a few of the important thing articles in my reporting on the Clint Curtis story. read them. and then if you find that any of your sick-advised questions above (or any new ones) still require answers, suppose free to let me be aware of. (here’s the smallest of tips to aid you get began, Leo: Clint Curtis in no way observed and even implied that he used this utility on *any* vote casting machines. additionally, you may also want to search for the definition for "prototype" in case you still are doubtful on the conception after reading the actual experiences — and i may suggest you trouble to study his actual affidavit if you are at it. and finally — your closing trace for now, Leo — Curtis certainly not claimed he was "paid money" to write down this prototype, he claimed to have achieved so whereas being paid a profits by a corporation who’s name you might be aware of if you to read a single one of the articles written on the subject). beyond that, feel free to proceed your disinfo crusade as you see healthy. it is going to take somewhat a little bit of your time, however unless you bother to pose questions according to the specific story being reoprted right here, I won’t bother to spend any longer of my time trying to assist you out. remark #seventy nine [Permalink] …

Leo Johnson
talked about on 12/21/2004 @ 10:22 am PT…

you might be hiding from the statistics Brad. Are there Black Helicopters hovering over your domestic? Do you have a tin Foil Hat? Did an enormous White Rabbit let you know? foolish Liberal… facts are for Republicans. i do know, I should still have well-known the effect once I threw the holy water of commonplace experience on you count Brad. best if youd open your eyes and seem, then youd recognize that here is what you need to be aware, (it could possibly support you in 2008) you are affected by P.E. S. T. publish Election Stress Trauma, and you simply desire it to be diverse (the election) and handiest if it could be actual that it changed into rigged then you definately’d be capable of breathe once again. Get the web Brad the election become now not rigged your guy Kerry misplaced fair and square. Please cease trashing the first rate name that bloggers nonetheless have. You started this trash and when we project you to return of with some actual facts you have none, and now youre using smoke and mirrors to fix it. simply because you typed up some excuses that try to clarify Curtis obtrusive holes inside his STORY, doesnt imply you’ve got records. It just potential that Curtis otherwise you how to write a superb STORY and too dangerous so sorry, neither of you arent that good at it. fact 1: A honest story doesnt want excuses to stand on its own truth 2: A in charge reporter does purpose and independent analysis. Please notice the words objective and impartial! fact three: You proceed to be duped (Hook line and Sinker) by Curtis. You posted this diatribe: http://www.crooksandliar…com/2004/12/06.html#a962 You were called or IMed (I count on by electronic capability) by means of Curtis and he recommended you that his healthy DOG died. you then moved on from that pseudo reality and wrote an eight paragraph article, concluding that someone KILLED his dog, so as to threaten or warn Curtis. a very good reporter would ask you these questions? Did you do any research that didn’t rely on Curtis claims? You typed;I don’t are looking to supply some other particulars for the second, but the story should still get available.Why would ANY story deserve to go out with out details? Do I the reader, even understand if Curtis even has a DOG, and in that case is it dead? can you prove the canines scientific background and what became cause of loss of life? What type of individuals in Florida? truth four: using your Biased Monolithic Polarized common sense I may write and completely distinct story with the very identical restrained suggestions of the DOG story and it will cling simply as a good deal water. Flash! This simply off the presses! visible simple programming knowledgeable, Clint Curtis otherwise match German Shepard receives hit by means of a motor vehicle with Florida tags! Flash! German Shepard gets attacked via un-considered enormous grub! Bigfoot eats DOG In Florida! film…Uhm, artist rendition at eleven! truth 5: Your web page and its biased postings aren’t that critical or informative to have brought on an assassination of the bad DOG, inside hours of you posting the story. fact / Opinion 6: Its not working. No serious media outlet has picked up on the story and backed it up, because Mr. Curtis story has too many holes in his story. That can not be demonstrated independently an would expose them to honest questions that hey couldn’t answer. (See how that works Brad?) truth / Opinion 7: Youre the usage of an historic liberal / leftist tactic; you throw out loads of accusations after which ask everyone else to disprove it, by making them prove the bad (some thing that in no way occur) therefore shifting the burden on them, as an alternative of YOU. reality eight: the area is affected by prototypes that on no account worked. Curtis application isn’t best VAPOR-ware it on no account took place nor could it happen as he claims it did. visible simple will no longer run on voting machines. sick classification it slowly so that you can consider. visual primary will now not run on balloting machines. Your boy Curtis claims to have used visible primary to rig the election. on his personal web page!http://www.justaflyonthe…com/votefraudprogram.htm fact 9: It nonetheless concerns no longer. If he signed an affidavit that claimed he flew to the moon and again would you write a story aiding that claim after which task the leisure of the world to disprove it? The rigged application story is barely as improbable with the VB issue and the prewriting of a HACK earlier than actual types of the balloting utility or hardware become made. unwell stop with the facts for now; you could get faint and upset. (Liberals can simplest take information in very small doses because it hurts their emotions.) cease the usage of the Knight_tyme element to distract everyone Brad; it become YOU who tried to make use of it as a degree of competition in the fist area, no longer I. Its an evident diversion tactic kind the difficulty at hand. That concern was: You the place being unwell-in charge and biased through the use of false documentation to make up a story and use it as supported for your already conceived conspiracy idea. Its funny that in a method, i am hoping you have an have an impact on on the Democratic celebration as a result of together with your state of mind we (the Republicans) may have the White condominium and extra of Congress in 2006 and 2008. keep up the decent work… Brad. Leo JohnsonKnight_tyme@hotmail.com remark #80 [Permalink] …

Mark Hopkins (aka rizzn)

stated on 12/21/2004 @ 1:12 pm PT…

Brad, earlier than I even start, I sigh to myself and check out to figure out precisely why i’m attempting to explain the glaring to you, since you refuse to even examine the entirety of our emails before responding, and that i be aware, for something rationale, principal media retailers like Air the usa make a decision to provide you with and Bev Harris characteristic interview slots, and if i will reach one person who speaks to many, then it *could* be price it. To be honest, i’m starting to re-consider that perception. I had in fact just read that article before writing to you lat time. a lot of your claims are definitely somewhat incorrect, even after an easy cursory read through Curtis’s web page. in addition, the center piece to the entire story, the source code to the vote fraud application, is purchasable on that website. Let me let you know as somebody who has been involved in knowledgeable programming from the time i was 14, that this application is little more than a comic story. It proves nothing as a prototype, and as a bit of specific *functioning* software, it is even *less* valuable. The application doesn’t even run on 80% of the machines I’ve tried to install it on. All that aside, the element of my letter was not to say that Curtis become really concerned in or claiming that he rigged the vote, but to claim that many americans *concerned with this* claim themselves that the voterigging would be inconceivable; having established that, why are we so very concerned with a undeniable Mr. Feeney’s congressional indiscretions? I present myself, first of all, as an expert on the box to returned up the claim that or not it’s unattainable, if now not inconceivable. simply in addition to you recognize how to make a story up that stirs all of the liberals in the nation to your aspect, i know programming, and this software is not best inconceivable, Curtis’s "prototype" us unable to perform or not it’s purported assignment, not to point out fall short of featuring a blueprint on the way to rig the vote. don’t even believe about making an attempt to follow it to another vote casting platform, it does not move muster on ANY stage. With this as your supposed smoking gun to show that there’s anything rotten in Denmark, how are you able to delude your self into believing *anything* untoward took place with the vote? if you are all in favour of finding out the reality, you just isn’t looking at things that may also be faked or lied about (corresponding to anecdotal evidence, own facts, affidavits, etc) — take a lesson from memogate and take your supply fabric to consultants in document forensics and take the supply code and ideas to precise consultants in the field. I don’t poo-poo this story on the groundwork that i’m a conservative, I poo-poo it on the foundation that i am a programmer, and my intelligence has been insulted through this crazed bunch of liberals in this nation making an attempt to convince me that there is an unlimited conspiracy of evil Republicans screwing with the voting process. or not it’s readily now not technically possible, and americans like Bev Harris are screwing with the laws of chance and feasibility and have satisfied an incredibly colossal number of otherwise clever individuals into believing in a fable. /mark remark #eighty one [Permalink] …

Leo Johnson
mentioned on 12/21/2004 @ 1:fifty three pm PT…

here’s a quick one for everybody… Brad responded to Mark Hopkins and CC’d it to me…Please be aware: this just part of Brad’s electronic mail and Im no longer taking it out of context Replying to you here, Mark, in its place of to Leo, however CC’ing him of path,considering that i am within the middle of fairly a number of issues, and don’t for the momenthavethe time to reply to Leo’s questions considering all of them have already beenanswered to (in case you guys stricken to study my exact reporting…See "SomeGood Questions Answered" as an instance at:https://bradblog.com/archives/00001036.htm As you can see he’s directed me / us to a FAQ for his article… note to Brad; in case you ought to write a FAQ on your postings… you failed. first rate articles don’t want FAQs be sure you have figured what questions could be requested earlier than hand and if the questions out weighted the article then you should definitely take a flow on the story. Brad, study the lesson right here, you might be think to do research that doesn’t reply on a single adult’s word. if you are going to do it, then, DO IT right! Do your homework BREFORE you publish it. comment #eighty two [Permalink] …

Brad
observed on 12/21/2004 @ 2:39 pm PT…

in view that Mark reposted his e mail here, I consider compelled to post my emailed reply — in it’s entirety — here as smartly. here it is… === I respect your opinions, Mark. As a programmer myself, i could have to disagree with you besides the fact that children. there’s nothing in Curtis’ basic little code that could not have been used (if any person wished to) in any of the valuable tabulating machines or voting machines. if you are unable to get a VB5 app to "run on 80% of the computers it became installed on", i am no longer sure what to tell you. As Curtis has observed, it became an easy software written in an afternoon. As a longtime (VB) programmer, I concur. There became nothing impressive refined about his prototype application. To that end, I also existing myself as an "expert" on the count number, although I haven’t mentioned *my* potential in that container, considering i’ve been reporting on the theme, leaving it to others unrelated to reporting to achieve this. and they have. Go study them. What *is* amazing are his claims that Tom Feeney conspired to tamper with the vote. period. If these claims are real, a prison changed into seemingly committed. we now have been going about picking if Curtis will also be relied on on this account, and to discover who else should be would becould very well be inclined to talk about it (there have been a number of others within the room on the time). to date, no longer a single declare of Curtis’ has confirmed to be unfaithful, and really, the majority of them had been proven to be precisely real and verifiable and confirmable by means of a variety of Public statistics, and greater. To the opposite, the vast majority of Mr. Feeney’s few claims, along with these of Yang’s lawyer’s (who turn up to be Mr. Feeney’s old legislation companions, and contributors still to Feeney) together with those of YEI themselves (as viewed on their website, and mentioned in some element here: https://bradblog.com/archives/00001054.htm) have confirmed *demonstrably* untrue. With exact proof. thus far, neither Feeney, nor YEI, nor their Attorneys (Feeney’s legislation companions) have introduced any proof to returned up *their* claims (that Curtis become "a disgruntled employee" that "Nee not ever worked at YEI", etc.). So in case you seem at the actual *facts* from either side, to date it be CURTIS: a number of – FEENEY/YEI & ATTORNEYS: Zero. we will see the way it unfolds. greater evidence to be produced which looks to be guide Curtis’ claims these days, incidentally. And sure, I examine your total emails (along with Leos). but i am too busy to trouble wasting time answering questions that have either already been publicly answered, or are primarily based on no account on any of my reporting or on Curtis’ publicly made claims. Brad remark #83 [Permalink] …

lawyer jim
pointed out on 12/24/2004 @ 6:forty one am PT…

How is Clint’s publication doing? i am certain with all this "publicity" the Bradblog is raising, that revenue for his book are up through 10 or 12. How a whole lot does that put for your pocket, Brad? comment #eighty four [Permalink] …

Clarence E. Walker Jr
observed on 12/30/2004 @ 5:14 pm PT…

the place is the Washington submit, CNN,NBC,FOX,ABC,CBS ? Does the BBC be aware of? smartly now a smartly saved secret is out let the total world comprehend that we of Black the usa knew with in our hearts that "dirty hands" applys to the Bush Election2000 right here is the Proof "World" remark #eighty five [Permalink] …

Rodolphe De Rosee
referred to on 2/11/2005 @ 12:52 pm PT…

unique article Brad! What’s additionally very wonderful is to study the comments from seemingly professional-Republican people…how they disguise personal opinions as supposedly "facts #1, 2, three, and so on"…and the way they label americans they dislike as "leftist/liberal/socialist". however can these pro-Republicans, who claim to grasp the truth, and make references to God repetitively, inform me what’s really incorrect with being a "Leftist", a "Liberal", or a "Socialist"? originally, is never one entitled to have one’s own political opinions with out being persecuted? Secondly, do you americans even comprehend what leftist, liberal and socialist mean? if you did you might recognize that "Socialist" and "Liberal" are truly contradictory phrases! Do you even be aware of what ideologies they signify? isn’t leftist ideology about redistribution of wealth with a view to assist the less lucky? Why is it wrong to accept as true with in assisting your fellow people, and (to continue with your introduction of faith) wasn’t Jesus the very one who pioneered these ideas? Please tell me what Republican ideology is all about aside from making funds, and the way it implies you are so a good deal nearer to THE certainty, and God! have you ever concept that the Republican’s insistence of introducing God, and (Holy) certainty inside a debate, become a strategy to justify arguments which would otherwise be undefendable?Open your eyes!!!!finally a truth is of the category: Bush justified the battle in Iraq via telling us he had hardcore facts that Iraq hosted Weapons of Mass Destruction….2 years later he acknowledges he turned into wrong.appears like big misinform me (and just one of the various MANY MANY!!!). So if your #1 Republican is incapable of telling us the actuality, how dare you claim that your opponents’ finest goal is to corrupt this country with their lies!!!! scent your own shit earlier than smelling others’! So unless you can prove me that Bush and Co. are telling the actuality, I might be inclined to trust these such as Brad who can supply workable facts of what basically happened. remark #86 [Permalink] …

Nunya
said on 3/10/2005 @ 11:13 am PT…

"Socialist" and "Liberal" aren’t necessarily contadictory terms. Social Democrats and Libertarian Socialists would be inclined to take concern with you, but thanks for form phrases. you’re right, most of the trolls, and many liberals, really haven’t regarded into all of it very tons. A liberal is one thing here and one other element in the relaxation of the world. To most of Europe, George Bush and Tony Blair are neo-liberals. Labels are practically unnecessary in political discourse nowadays. comment #87 [Permalink] …

MTS
stated on 3/12/2005 @ 6:fifty seven am PT…

I completely admire bloggers as journalists, I believe they give a extremely indispensable outlet for news, akin to this story. As if reporting is never shameless enough, bloggers do it well-nigh for free. just the very presence of a smartly-written story helps us get nearer to the fact. They may also convey down a man like Dan reasonably, or point out discrepancies in FOX information’ broadcasts. however now and again they fall flat on their face, which is the risk in partisan investigative journalism. it be there if you want to talk about it. however i’m bound the colossal majority of american citizens, John Kerry protected, accept as true with this story has too many unfastened ends and too a whole lot information depends fully on one person whose persona and factors are unknown to the leisure of the world. retain doing what you might be doing, Brad. As a student of journalism, i do know what you might be doing is important, and that i wish extra americans put within the time and effort you do. I just do not feel you might have bought anything else this time. comment #88 [Permalink] …

Jeanne Chebib Presidential Candidate Washington DC 2004

spoke of on four/1/2005 @ eleven:20 am PT…

I have file two complaints to the Federal Election fee by certified Mail and FAX that:The State of Ohio Owe me three Billions greenbacks for Damages case 2cv1419 and for re-election de G.W.Bush 2004 have decide Gladys Kessler has accepted a case CR60 to revert her own award judgement :The legislation says four months to file and the attorney well-known of Ohio filed in 7 months about ,and the State of Ohio had failed the Federal laws RICO grievance.Others circumstances 2cv1433 stealing my racing Horses and canine,and 2cv1488 State of Ohio And Samaritan sanatorium in Ashland County battery and violence into the palms of CIA Dr.cover to are trying to smash my criminal brain and extra including attempted murder in Jan 15,2000 on my existence and amount of Sham Pleadings and Harrassement originated in Washington D.C.:Mrs Schiavo can also also have like me a supporter of the U.S. charter and had been a victime and therefore the influence. comment #89 [Permalink] …

the martins

observed on 5/9/2005 @ eleven:17 am PT…

Brad, i couldn’t find an extra approach to get in touch with you so please forgive and welcome our note… pricey Brad, incredible internet web site! We know all too a lot about what your web web page deals with, please evaluate our net web site and ADD it to your hyperlinks page or "beneficial sites web page"http://www.self-protection.info The psychology behind this biography is "bar none" the "best" to cope with abusive employers "disgruntled bosses" BULLIES, in certain cases, as a result of in the event you be trained from this, what can also be executed and noted, one may under no circumstances should work once again as a result of damages accomplished by means of and employersand the fact that the executive permits it! this is potentially pricelessespecially when it’s used!!!! Please call if in case you have any questions…we are searching for somebody who is just as honorable to help launch this into the mainstream. somebody who knows advertising/advertising/and so on.suppose free to flow this e mail alongside… Thanks ever so a good deal on your time and consideration. clearly the martin familypo field 3roselawn, in 46372219-765-5019 ps. this has been nominated for the 2005 Entrepreneur of the yr Award!…. we hope to be within the winners circle Let Whistleblowers make a stronger declare! please evaluate http://self-insurance plan.blogspot.com/ http://agencies.yahoo.com/…arassmentDiscrimination/ comment #ninety [Permalink] …

mildred l. smith

talked about on 5/21/2005 @ 11:sixteen pm PT…

:angry:i am so irritated at the democratic celebration for standing by and enabling the election to be privatized via the republican party. There is no manner that the republicans would have allowed this to occur to their members. The democrats make me irritated trying to repersent the republicans as an alternative the individuals from their personal party. If i needed a republican to rapersent me i would have voted republican. They may still all be taught from Barbera Lee. remark #ninety one [Permalink] …

Jim
referred to on 10/25/2006 @ four:sixteen pm PT…

here’s so tons BS it’s superb that anybody would fall for it. Oh what am I saying you’re Democrats of direction you trust it. The citizens from voter fraud companies did not trust him. John Conyers investigators didn’t accept as true with Curtis. Vote Fraud did not buy his story. all the native papers apart from the Daytona beach information Journal a Democrat owned paper pointed out that the man became mendacity. He changed into fired from YEI for incompetence. Tom Feeney does not kill canine at night a further stated Curtis declare. The man just bought several Florida Police departments in problem by means of claiming on his website that they had endorsed him. that is of direction unlawful however the guy is a pathological liar. He has after being caught at that changed the declare to replicate that it turned into now not the Departments however the Teamsters who endorsed him. The man is not only nuts he is dull as well. The intent the entire investigations through which he became worried concluded he turned into a liar was there have been NO digital touch displays IN FLORIDA all over THE 2000 VOTE AS CURTIS CLAIMED. it really is WHY WE had been ALL RECOUNTING PAPER BALLOTS, DUH!!! The best individuals trying to steal an election were the Gore dems. They desired to maintain counting the ballots except the Constitutional time limit passed and all of the votes in Florida have been void as a result of our electors had been no longer seated. Gore would have gained with forty nine states and you mopes would have come lower back to blame the Republicans for now not certifying the votes. similar to you tried guilty the Republicans for the incompetence in Dade, Broward and Palm seashore counties. All Democrat, all Democrat election supervisors, majority Democrat canvassing boards. No shock that they couldn’t count number, but once more the mopes of the realm try to location the blame on the Republicans. Yeah, they were attempting to steal the election and picked the Democrat controlled counties through which to do it. and that they mean you can people vote, no ask yourself the country is having challenge at the polls. Alabama: the way to be sure Your Vote Counts in the 2020 Election

© Grace Han/Thrillist

The 2020 general Election on November three is quickly coming near, and if you vote in Alabama, so are the vital closing dates and directions you’re going to need to observe to be sure your vote counts. don’t freak out, although. take some time to make a plan. The COVID-19 pandemic might imply that casting your ballot might seem a bit distinct this time round, so it would behoove you to spend some extra time to make certain you might be all set to vote — and vote safely. Alabama offers a couple of alternate options for balloting. yes, which you could go to your polling region and vote in adult, but if you’re concerned about coronavirus, the state has issued information that allows you to vote absentee and ship your pollin the mail. in case you choose the latter route, it’s essential to take into account how lengthy it could take in your ballot to arrive on your mailbox after you request it and the way long it should take to get lower back to election officials after you will have completed it and sent it. You do not want to pass over the cut-off date and have your pollthrown out. As for the previous route, there are ways to provide yourself with protection whereas navigating your polling location. here’s every little thing you deserve to understand.  What’s the cut-off date to register to vote in Alabama?You need to register to vote or update your voter registration 15 days earlier than Election Day, making the cut-off date for the November three, 2020 election October 19, 2020. Register appropriate away. if you can’t appropriate this minute, then set your self a reminder in your cellphone or mark your kitchen calendar or write it down on a sticky note and connect it to your brow — whatever it takes. how to register to vote in AlabamaAlabama has a list of five key necessities you ought to meet with the intention to be eligible to register: You need to be a citizen of the U.S., you need to reside in Alabama, you need to be as a minimum 18 on or before election day, you should now not be barred from voting because of a criminal conviction, and also you ought to now not were deemed "mentally incompetent" in a court docket of law. Residents can register to vote on-line, by way of mail, or in person at their native board of registrars. The safest and most easy way, of path, is to put up a voter registration software online, which requires you to both meet the above necessities and have a valid Alabama driver’s license or state id card. that you would be able to also download and fill out a printable voter registration form and mail it to your local board of registrars, or request that they ship you a broadcast kind within the mail for you to fill out and return. that you could opt for any of those alternatives on the Alabama Secretary of State’s legitimate voter registration page. just take into account that submitting a voter registration application does not imply you might be immediately registered to vote. The nation Board of Registrars should evaluate and approve your application first. which you can use Alabama’s online voter suggestions tool to verify your registration reputation and lookup your polling area, or you can use this directory attain out to your native Board of Registrars at once. additionally be aware that Alabama has a strict voter id legislation, so no be counted how you register to vote, you have to bring a legitimate picture identity with you to your polling location. if you don’t convey some of the approved styles of picture identification, you may additionally nonetheless be capable of vote if two election officers are in my opinion capable of establish you and post a signed affidavit.  am i able to vote early?Alabama unfortunately would not offer an early vote casting duration.can i vote with the aid of mail?while Alabama would not do early vote casting, you could turn in an absentee ballot if you are unable to make it to your local polling place on Election Day. youngsters the state does require you to cite a cause of why you’re asking for an absentee ballot, officials are enabling voters who’re concerned about the COVID-19 pandemic to opt for the "disorder" choice on the absentee ballot application kind, which we will get to here in a minute. The absentee process takes time, so make sure you get it started right away in case you hope to forged and absentee pollin time.  how to request an absentee pollin AlabamaThe Alabama Secretary of State’s site particulars the prolonged technique to request an absentee ballot.  First, you’ll deserve to fill out the absentee ballot software for your county (sure, every county has its own absentee pollsoftware). The form requires a few items of assistance, akin to your name and handle (for voter registration verification), your celebration affiliation, the address the place you need your pollmailed, your voter signature, and the explanation why you are going to be absent from the polls on Election Day. if you’re planning to vote absentee since you’re worried about coronavirus and do not consider protected displaying up at your local polling vicinity as a result of the pandemic, the state is permitting you to select the rationale labeled "I even have a actual sickness or infirmity which prevents my attendance on the polls. [ID Required]" on the software form.  when you’ve stuffed out the form, return it to your county’s Absentee Election manager with the aid of mail or via delivering it in person along with a replica of your picture id. Alabama requires that absentee pollapplications be grew to become in no later than the fifth calendar day earlier than the election, however you should not reduce it that close — post your utility presently. When your utility is approved, the Absentee Election manager will both mail your ballot to the tackle you certain (this can take even more time) or hand it to you in adult, in accordance with the Alabama Secretary of State’s web site. We cannot emphasize sufficient how critical it is to get your application in neatly forward of the time limit.  how to vote absentee in AlabamaThe first step right here is easy: follow the guidelines and fill out the absentee pollyou obtain. The second half presents a moderate complication, though: you deserve to have your absentee ballot affidavit notarized by a notary public (some banks present this carrier to consumers for gratis) or signed by way of two witnesses in order on your vote to count number.  Now, for the absentee vote casting closing dates. in keeping with the Alabama Secretary of State, all absentee ballots sent with the aid of mail must be postmarked no later than the day before the election and received by means of the Absentee Election manager no later than noon on Election Day. if you are providing your absentee ballot by hand, you have to be certain you get it to the Absentee Election supervisor no later than 5pm on the day before the election.  obviously remember to get your accomplished absentee ballot in the mail well before the postmark cut-off date to make sure it receives to the Absentee Election manager in time. do not procrastinate. Sending your pollagain to election officials on November 2 could imply that it is going to arrive too late, on the grounds that the time it could possibly take for it to travel within the mail. provide yourself at least just a few days to be protected. the earlier, the superior.

© Alabama Secretary of State

How can i be sure my absentee ballot is counted?For one, be sure it gets to your native Absentee Election manager on time. and make sure your affidavit is both notarized or witnessed by two americans. those are the evident ones. however there are different steps that you may take to make certain absentee ballot is counted come Election Day. each absentee pollcomes with three envelopes — one for each and every part. there is a undeniable secrecy envelope for the pollitself, an envelope with the accompanying affidavit printed on the outside, and eventually, a pre-addressed envelope with a view to serve as the outer envelope containing the outdated two envelopes. cautiously follow the directions for using these envelopes. listed below are the step-by means of-step guidance, per the Alabama Secretary of States web page: 1. Seal your achieved pollin the plain envelope 2. vicinity the undeniable envelope inner the accompanying affidavit envelope three. Seal the affidavit envelope and finished the affidavit it really is on the backyard of the envelope 4. sign the affidavit and have the signature witnessed by way of either a notary or two witnesses who’re 18 or older 5. region a copy of your image voter identity within the outer envelope 6. send the pollto the Absentee Election manager with the aid of US Mail or by using commercial service; or personally convey the ballot to the Absentee Election manager you should additionally are trying to prevent ripping or in any other case harmful any of your absentee balloting substances. This does not seem like specific as a requirement any place in the state’s professional voting information, but it’s always a good idea to keep away from hurt to your voting substances in order that your ballot isn’t thrown out on some type of technicality.  How am i able to dwell safe whereas vote casting in adult?First and gold standard, use the Alabama Votes device to locate your polling region and its hours. whereas balloting by absentee ballot in the mail is probably going the most secure strategy to take part in this election, there are ways you can reduce the chance of getting COVID-19 in case you plan to vote in person at your native polling place. basically, the centers for ailment control & Prevention has issued defense thoughts for voters — all of which might be standard steps that you may take to guard yourself and others. here’s a rundown of what the CDC recommends, per its legit election counsel page: wear a mask.  retain a distance of at least six toes from others always. Wash your hands each before and after leaving your polling location. Use alcohol-primarily based hand sanitizer containing at least 60% alcohol generally throughout your time internal the polling area, above all after you touch things like door hands, vote casting machines, and different surfaces that lots of other individuals contact. if you cough or sneeze, cover them with a tissue or the interior of your elbow. dispose of the tissues in a lined trashcan, then use that 60% alcohol hand sanitizer once again.  these are the fundamentals, however the CDC also recommends just a few belongings you may additionally not have concept about: don’t are attempting to disinfect the vote casting machine or device your self since you can also become harmful them with cleaners and disinfectant items. here’s where hand sanitizer comes in again. Use it appropriate after you contact the vote casting equipment, and in case you use it before you touch the gadget, make certain your palms have dried first.  try to vote when your polling place isn’t as busy. This could contain riding by way of and checking to see how long the road is. investigate that you simply’re registered to vote earlier than you depart home and make sure you deliver any documents you are going to need to avoid issues that might influence in spending extra time interior the polling location. carry your personal black ink pen for marking your ballot, or your personal stylus (just consult with a polling area worker before you employ it).  If possible, fill out a pattern ballot at home so that you can use to velocity up casting your ballot on the polling area.  The bottom line: use your ordinary feel. We’re six months into this pandemic, so remember to comprehend the drill by means of now.additional Alabama voting resourcesSign up right here for our every day Thrillist e mail and subscribe right here for our YouTube channel to get your repair of the ultimate in meals/drink/fun.
 Tony Merevick is Senior information Editor at Thrillist. ship information counsel to news@thrillist.com and observe him on Twitter @tonymerevick..




tags: , , , ,